Vest

AAG je rekel/-la:

Slovenska vlada je podlegla Italjanski strani glede izgradnje plinskih terminalov v Tržaškem zalivu. Presoje vplivov na okolje so narejene ene za javnost druge pa kot zaupni dokumenti vlad in se močno razlikujejo med seboj! Bojimo se da bo primorska postala žrtev meddržavnih “kupčkanj”, tokrat za podporo Italije glede meje z Hrvaško, na račun zdravja prebivalcev in zaščite okolja v Tržaškem zalivu z obeh strani meje!

V Greenslo, čakamo samo še na dokumet, ki nam bo potrdil, da se bile presoje vplivov na okloje tako iz Slovenske kot z Italjanske strani “prilagojene” na medržavni ravni vlad obeh držav, da lahko predamo zadevo tožicem in evropskemu sodišču!

Pri nameravani izgradnji plinovoda - Južni tok, ki bi ga uporabljali samo Italjijani pa bi Slovenija, Italiji poklonila 0,3% Slovenskega ozemlja, ker politiki nočejo slišati zahteve Greenslo, da se spelje plinovod po starih omrežjih in bi z malo predelave zadostovala potrebam ” Južnega toka”. Po drugi strani pa se v Greenslo sprašujemo, zakaj mediji populistično pišejo o vrnitvi ozemlja Hrvaške Sloveniji, kjer gre za vseskupaj za 0,001% ozemlja po drugi strani pa molčijo, ko ga bomo Italiji poklonili 0,3%, z vsemi dodatnimi negativnimi vplivi na okloje, ki jih bo nameravana izgradnja plinovoda povzročila!!!

Za boljše razumevanje vam spodaj prilagamo samo nekaj pisem, ki jih vsakodnevno prijemamo na e-naslov greenslo in sporočilo službe za odnose z javnostmi MOP.
Green Slo
Alpe Adria Green

ProPolis je rekel/-la:

No, na vrhu vsega pa je Cveta Zalokar Oražem včeraj na Tv Slovenija dokaj jasno povedala še to, da bi bilo najbolje, da se s politiko ukvarjajo le bogati ljudje …
Komentar take “politike prihodnosti” zagotovo ni nujen.

Bount je rekel/-la:

Hojla, da, bogati v srcu..itd..in modri, to je bistvo, ne pa da imajo velike bančne račune, saj poznate pregovor: več denarja ko ima, več ga hoče..itd.. na kratko in enostavno povedano..upam, da se razumemo…

Maja je rekel/-la:

Zgleda, da še nimamo dovolj, saj dopuščamo take svinjarije. Mogl bi se združt, pa pred parlament! Mormo se zbudit! Elena, budilko še močnej navij!

Elena Pečarič je rekel/-la:

Ne jamrat, to nič ne pomaga; dajte konkretne predloge

Zala je rekel/-la:

Zares - nova politika! Koga imajo za norca? Mogoče smo bili na začetku še mal naivni, vsaj nekater(jz), zdj mi grejo na bruhanje! Laž je napaka?

medek je rekel/-la:

Demokracija enkrat na štiri leta :)

medek je rekel/-la:

UPRAVLJANJE Z VODO, NADZOR NAD VODO, pa magari z vojsko :)

Sedaj opažam “navado”, da je ob vsakem izviru še ena razčefukana salonitka zraven, diši po načrtovanju.

medek je rekel/-la:

v
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04iSc3VjAz8&feature

Nada je rekel/-la:

Politika je kurba!

Elena Pečarič je rekel/-la:

Očitno nam še vedno ne gre dovolj slabo.
Slovenci in Slovenke so nagnjeni k mazohizmu in podrejanju.

Elena Pečarič je rekel/-la:

Bora Džordžević je rekel, da smo Slovenci Bečki Konjušari

Elena Pečarič je rekel/-la:

…Nemoj da ideš mojom ulicom

Elena Pečarič je rekel/-la:

…rado ču na tebi da potrošim zrno…
zato nemoj, ni u ludilu nemoj, mojom ulicom

Bount je rekel/-la:

G. Elena, hvala, super izbira, ogled se priporoča, pa da vidimo dali če narod ipak nešto shvatiti , pa bio bi skrajni čas!

Bount je rekel/-la:

Pa še ena pesmica:
jao, kud si moje velko srce otišlo, moja jedina ljubav, jao kako te volim ja, pa ništa drugo nije važno, samo da ti postojiš, pa sve drugo i ako propade, ništa me ne briga, samo da ti, velika moja ljubav
postojiš, nemoj molim te, da me ostaviš, pa ti si meni sve i svašta, ti i moje piče jedini ste , koji mi nešto značite, jao kako vas volim ja……

Zbik je rekel/-la:

Aha… zdaj razumem
Politika prihodnosti –> Рибља Чорба

medek je rekel/-la:

“V letih 2002-2007 smo v Sloveniji pozidali skoraj 20 tisoč hektarjev zemljišč, od tega 65 odstotkov kmetijskih. Na dan pozidamo enajst oziroma sedem hektarjev kmetijskih površin. Slovenija ima na prebivalca le še 880 kvadratnih metrov njiv in vrtov, Evropska unija pa 2545 kvadratnih metrov,” so pred kratkim objavili v Večeru. Ob teh podatkih se postavlja vprašanje, koliko časa bomo še imeli njive za lastno pridelavo hrane.

Koliko časa bomo še imeli njive za lastno pridelavo hrane
http://razgledi.net/blog/2009/06/08/koliko-casa-bomo-se-imeli-njive-za-lastno-pridelavo-hrane/

Elena Pečarič je rekel/-la:

LET IT DIE
by Douglas Rushkoff

http://www.arthurmag.com/2009/03/16/let-it-die-rushkoff-on-the-economy/

March 15, 2009

With any luck, the economy will never recover.

In a perfect world, the stock market would decline another 70 or 80 percent along with the shuttering of about that fraction of our nation’s banks. Yes, unemployment would rise as hundreds of thousands of formerly well-paid brokers and bankers lost their jobs; but at least they would no longer be extracting wealth at our expense. They would need to be fed, but that would be a lot cheaper than keeping them in the luxurious conditions they’re enjoying now. Even Bernie Madoff costs us less in jail than he does on Park Avenue.

Alas, I’m not being sarcastic. If you had spent the last decade, as I have, reviewing the way a centralized economic plan ravaged the real world over the past 500 years, you would appreciate the current financial meltdown for what it is: a comeuppance. This is the sound of the other shoe dropping; it’s what happens when the chickens come home to roost; it’s justice, equilibrium reasserting itself, and ultimately a good thing.

I started writing a book three years ago through which I hoped to help people see the artificial and ultimately dehumanizing landscape of corporatism on which we conduct so much of our lives. It’s not just that I saw the downturn coming—it’s that I feared it wouldn’t come quickly or clearly enough to help us wake up from the self-destructive fantasy of an eternally expanding economic frontier. The planet, and its people, were being taxed beyond their capacity to produce. Try arguing that to a banker whose livelihood is based on perpetuating that illusion, or to people whose retirement incomes depend on just one more generation falling for the scam. It’s like arguing to Brooklyn’s latest crop of brownstone buyers that they’ve invested in real estate at the very moment the whole market is about to tank. (I did; it wasn’t pretty.)

Now that the scheme we have mistaken for the real economy is collapsing under its own weight, however, it’s a whole lot easier to make these arguments. And, if anything, it’s even more important for us to come to grips with the fact that the system in peril is not a natural one, or even one that we should be attempting to revive and restore. The thing that is dying—the corporatized model of commerce—has not, nor has it ever been, supportive of the real economy. It wasn’t meant to be. And before we start lamenting its demise or, worse, spending good money after bad to resuscitate it, we had better understand what it was for, how it nearly sucked us all dry, and why we should put it out of our misery.

Chartered Corporations

Back in the good ol’ days—I mean as far back as the late middle ages—people just did business with each other. As traveling got easier and people got access to new resources and markets, a middle class of merchants and small businesspeople started to get wealthy. So wealthy that they threatened the power of the aristocracy. Monarchs needed to come up with a way to stabilize their own wealth before the free market unseated them.

They invented the corporate charter. By granting an exclusive charter, a king could give one of his friends in the merchant class monopoly control over a region or sector. In exchange, he’d get shares in the company. So the businessperson no longer had to worry about competition—his position at the top of the business hierarchy was locked in place, by law. And the monarch never had to worry about losing his authority; businesses with crown-guaranteed charters tend to support the crown.

But this changed the shape of business fundamentally. Instead of thriving on innovation and progress, corporate monopolies simply sought to extract wealth from the regions they controlled. They didn’t need to compete, anymore, so they just sucked resources from places and people. Meanwhile, people living and working in the real world lost the ability to generate value by or for themselves.

For example: In the 1700s, American colonists were allowed to grow corn but they weren’t allowed to do anything with it–except sell it at fixed prices to the British East India Trading Company, the corporation sanctioned by England to do business in the colonies. Colonists weren’t allowed to sell their cotton to each other or, worse, make clothes out of it. They were mandated, by law, to ship it back to England where clothes were fabricated by another chartered monopoly, then shipped back to America where they could be purchased. The American war for independence was less a revolt against England than a revolt against her chartered corporations.

The other big innovation of the early corporate era was monopoly currency. There used to be lots of different kinds of money. Local currencies, which helped regions reinvest in their own activities, and centralized currencies, for long distance transactions. Local currencies were earned into existence. A farmer would grow a bunch of grain, bring it to the grain store, and get receipts for how much grain he had deposited. The receipts could be used as money—even by people who didn’t need grain at that particular moment. Everyone knew what it was worth.

The interesting thing about local, grain-based currencies was that they lost value over time. The people at the grain store had to be paid, and a certain amount of grain was lost to rain or rodents. So every year, the money would be worth less. This encouraged people to spend it rather than save it. And they did. Late Middle Ages workers were paid more for less work time than at any point in history. Women were taller in England in that era than they are today—an indication of their relative health. People did preventative maintenance on their equipment, and invested in innovation. There was so much extra money looking for productive investment, that people built cathedrals. The great cathedrals of Europe were not paid for with money from the Vatican; they were local investments, made by small towns looking for ways to share their prosperity with future generations by creating tourist attractions.

Local currencies favored local transactions, and worked against the interests of large corporations working from far away. In order to secure their own position as well as that of their chartered monopolies, monarchs began to make local currencies illegal, and force locals to instead use “coin of the realm.” These centralized currencies worked the opposite way. They were not earned into existence, they were lent into existence by a central bank. This meant any money issued to a person or business had to be paid back to the central bank, with interest.

What does that do to an economy? It bankrupts it. Think of it this way: A business borrows 1000 dollars from the bank to get started. In ten years, say, it is supposed to pay back 2000 to the bank. Where does the other 1000 come from? Some other business that has borrowed 1000 from the bank. For one business to pay back what it owes, another must go bankrupt. That, or borrow yet another 1000, and so on.

An economy based on an interest-bearing centralized currency must grow to survive, and this means extracting more, producing more and consuming more. Interest-bearing currency favors the redistribution of wealth from the periphery (the people) to the center (the corporations and their owners). Just sitting on money—capital—is the most assured way of increasing wealth. By the very mechanics of the system, the rich get richer on an absolute and relative basis.

The biggest wealth generator of all was banking itself. By lending money at interest to people and businesses who had no other way to conduct transactions or make investments, banks put themselves at the center of the extraction equation. The longer the economy survived, the more money would have to be borrowed, and the more interest earned by the bank.

Financial Meltdown

Which is pretty much how things have worked over the past 500 years to today. So what went wrong? Nothing. The system worked exactly as it was supposed to. The problem was that after America’s post WWII expansion, there was really no longer any real growth area in the economy from which to extract wealth. We were producing and consuming about as much as we could. Almost no commercial activity was occurring outside the corporate system. There was no room left to grow. Sure, outsourcing, lay-offs, and technology created some efficiencies, but wars, rising costs of health care, and exchange rates essentially offset any gains.

Making matters worse, all that capital that the wealthy had accumulated needed markets—even fake markets—in which to be invested. There was a ton of money out there—just nowhere to put it. Nothing on which to speculate.

The dot.com boom seemed to offer the promise of a new market, but it fizzled almost as quickly as it rose. So speculators turned instead to real assets, like corn, oil, even real estate. They started investing speculatively on the things that real people need to stay alive. What real people didn’t understand was that there is no way to compete against speculators. Speculators aren’t buying homes in which to live—they are buying houses to flip. Speculators aren’t buying corn to eat or oil to burn, but bushels to hoard and tankers to park off shore until prices rise. The fact that the speculative economy for cash and commodities accounts for over 95% of economic transactions, while people actually using money and consuming commodities constitute less than 5% tells us something important. Real supply and demand have almost nothing to do with prices. We do not live in an economy, we live in a Ponzi scheme.

Luckily for us, the banks, and the speculators depending on them, made a bad wager: they bet on our continuing capacity to provide a reality on which to base their highly leveraged schemes. We just couldn’t do it. They put us between a rock and a hard place. With George W’s help, they sold us on the notion of home ownership as a prerequisite to the American dream. And they created a number of loan products which made it look as if we could actually afford over-priced homes. The banking industry spent hundreds of millions of dollars lobbying for laws making bankruptcy difficult or impossible for average people to accomplish—while simultaneously selling average people loans that they would never be able to pay back.

The banks didn’t really care, anyway, since they never meant to keep these loans. They simply provided the cash to mortgage companies, who then packaged the loans. In return for putting up the original cash, the banks also won the right to underwrite the sale of those mortgage packages to investors—investors like pension funds, retirement funds, or you and me. Get it? The banks get all the interest, but we put up all the money. Our retirement accounts and pension funds invest in the very mortgages that we can’t pay back. The bank collects any interest, playing both sides of the equation but responsible for neither.

And when the whole scheme begins to break down, what do we do? We try to bail out the very banks that created the mess, under the premise that we need these banks in order for business to come back, since only banks can lend the capital required for businesses to flourish.

Yes, It is Wrong

President Obama may be smarter than most of us, but he’s still attempting to rescue the very institutions that robbed us in the first place. He’s not a socialist, as conservatives may be arguing, but he is a corporatist. Using future tax dollars to fund government job programs is one thing. Using future tax dollars to give banks more money to lend out at interest is robbing from the poor to pay the rich to rob from the poor.

As painful as it might be to watch, and as irritating as it might be to those with shrinking retirement savings, the collapse of the centralized corporate economy is ultimately a good thing. It makes room for a real economy to rise up in its place. And while it may be temporarily uncomfortable for the rich, and even temporarily devastating for the poor, it may be the fastest and least violent way to dismantle a system set in place for the benefit of 14th Century monarchs who have long since left this earth.

If the corporate supermarket chain’s debt structure renders it incapable of stocking its shelves this spring, this may be the wake-up call that consumers need to finally subscribe to a Community Supported Agriculture farmer. If the former associate fund analyst at Lehman realizes that he is unable to get a job not just because his industry is contracting but because his work day creates no real value for anyone at all, he will be forced to learn how to do something that does. If an urban elite parent realizes he can no longer pay private school tuition for his kids, maybe he’ll consider donating to public school the time he would have spent earning that tuition.

In short, the less we are able to depend on business-as-usual to provide for our basic needs, the more we will be forced to provide them for ourselves and one another. Sometimes we’ll do this for free, because we like each other, or live in the same community. Sometimes we’ll exchange services or favors. Sometimes we’ll use one of the alternative, local currencies coming into use across the country as Central bank-issued currencies become too hard to get without a corporate job.

Deprived of centralized banks and corporations, we’ll be forced to do things again. And in the process, we’ll find out that these institutions were not our benefactors at all. They were never meant to be. They were invented to mediate transactions between people, and extract the value that would have passed between us. Far from making commerce or industry more efficient, they served to turn the real world into a set of speculative assets, and real people into debtors.

The current financial crisis is the best opportunity we have had in a very long time for a bloodless revolution against the faceless fascism under which we have been living, unaware, for much too long. Let us seize the day.

(UPDATE: “Hack Money, Hack Banking” by Douglas Rushkoff, the March 20 follow-up to “Let It Die,” is available here.)

Longtime Arthur columnist Douglas Rushkoff has just finished his life’s work, “Life Inc: How the world became a corporation and how to take it back,” to be published June 2, 2009 by Random House. (Pre-order info: Amazon). His live talk radio show, Media Squat Radio, airs Mondays 7-8pm EDT on WFMU. Streams at http://www.wfmu.org and iTunes.

Previous Rushkoff columns on the economy:
“No Money Down” (Arthur No. 31/Oct 2008)
“Riding Out the Credit Crisis” (Arthur No. 29/May 2008)

Bount je rekel/-la:

He - the One- is more like a beauty King and he said I’am the One, go to dance on the floor in a round, he told me his name is Ji Ji and I’am the One, and the chance is you are not mine Sun and he said I’am the One, dance with me, come with me, down to the deep river waters, dance with me and the dark will swallow me and you and I’am the One…

Zbik je rekel/-la:

— Elena, žal sem zanjič od tebe dobill še preveč predvidljivo demonstracijo tega, kar sem slutil in antifrastično napovedal. Žal… pravim, ker nisem zaradi tega nič bolj srečen ali pameten. In … ne le, da ne bom ugibal…me sploh ne zanima, na koga te spominjam. Si pa dovolim in jemljem pravico, da se še naprej po malem “zezam”… ja, demokracija je PAČ ogabna zadeva, ker je treba včasih slišati ali prebrati tudi stvari, ki nam niso všeč… Zveni znano, kajne, toda usodna je dvoreznost tega “dejstva”. Kaj naj še rečem? Mir s tabo Elena in uživaj v svojih agendah…

Mimogrede… si opazila, kakšen krasen lapsus se ti je zadnjič posrečil…? Ni bil ravno ontološko razodetje ali epistmološki rez, je pa bil — po tiradi zmerljivih imen — besni “rez zamere”… xexe :)

— Bounty, darling.
Packasto citiraš tvojega idiotskega idola. A v tvojem idiličnem svetu niti copy-paste ne sme pravilno delovati…, da dela prav? Ali pa te packasti namen motivira… Evo ti … en bukolični motiv.

…Ma key bo winu, ma key bo wsie, če Štajnerju swoye daš srcie… srcie….

tech je rekel/-la:

Zbik, ni čudno takšne kvasiš, da so te zadnjič na komentarju cenzuriral.
Premisl preden kaj napišeš!
Čist lušten jje opazovat kako te bejba razkuri, ha ha

Mirjana je rekel/-la:

Zbikovi komentarji so zelo dobri po eni strani,…saj opravlja z zvrhanim košem tujk,…tako da nam da vedeti, da je zelo inteligenten in poronicljiv,….a to je tudi vse…le kaj lahko počneš s tvojimi spoznanji?…lahko se smehljaš nad sveto preproščino (in če je forum namenjen tudi preprostemu človeku, da je vsaj približno seznanjen z nekaj pomembnimi dejstvi…je pač potrebno temu primerno napisati)…antifrastično…ontološko…epistmološki..bukolični ..in če dodam še ingliš,…si res faca!
Se enostavno zgražati, in zvrha gledati na trud nekaterih, ki še niso prispeli do stopnje tvolje iluminacije,…pa je enako preprostem dejstu….ukakil sm se…alias…me son kaga adosso..(italijan)
pa brez zamere :)

Elena Pečarič je rekel/-la:

http://www.vest.si/2009/07/07/stranka-sem-si/

Mirjana je rekel/-la:

Nekdo,…ne…je v tebi…ali pa tudi ne, …zavisi..če hočeš ostatio le nekdo…

Elena Pečarič je rekel/-la:

Anonimneži!
25. oktober 2008 ob 20:04 | Elena Pečarič |
Vsi so obmolknili, vsi so se ustrašili,
ti, ki prazno slamo mlatijo,
ti, ki žalijo in ponižujejo.
Kje ste gobci, vi junaki,
arogantni »mačoti«, kam ste se skrili,
namesto, da z mano bi se borili?

Ste se ustrašili, spreminjati svet,
v katerem, bi bilo za vse boljše živet;
je to pretežko vam počet?
Veliko lažje je stokati in pred televizijo sedeti
ali s pivom v roki med sebi podobnimi,
frajerje igrati in do jutranjih ur v prazno blebetati.

Kje ste brezimni korenjaki,
ki ste se sami sebi zdeli heroji,
a ste izpadli bedaki?
Ste mislili, da moj je hec,
kar sem vam govorila,
vas je beseda in z njo rima,
v ponos ranila, v pojmu ubila?

Nič zato, saj bo že šlo,
če razmišljali boste z gornjo glavo.
Morda, pa le nekoč in nekje,
beseda ponovno vam povrne se.
Za misli svoje boste znali zastaviti,
svoj glas in svoj obraz,
na nogah boste šele takrat sposobni stati,
ko si boste izrečene besede,
z imenom in priimkom,
upali podpisati.

Elena Pečarič

Matilda je rekel/-la:

Sem že premislila, dolgo nazaj, zato jo pa podpiram in se tudi oglasim večkrat, a kaj, ko je vse to naše pisanje, naše želje, upanja, predlogi, kot glas vpijočega v puščavi, ker karavana gre po svoje dalje, za svojimi egoističnimi, ozkimi cilji.

Elena Pečarič je rekel/-la:

Defeat Capitalism -? Leave the false freedom in the dust!

The yearly meeting of the economically leading nations, which in the last times 2007
and 2008 caused massive protests in Germany and Japan, this time takes place from the
8th till the 10th of July in Italy. Eight years after Genua, the rightist extremist
premier Silvio Berlusconi again hosts the summit meeting. At that time the italian
police shot and killed a demonstrator and tortured dozens. The premier plead for
acquittals, some responsible persons have been advanced to EU positions meanwhile.

Ten years after the blockade of the meeting of the World Trade Organisation in
Seattle 1999 it is shown that the leading industrial nations, despite of massive
critic, still continue their exploitative and violent economical politics. This
politics lead to the crisis of today. Only repression remains for preventative
combatting of uprisings.

Military operations against the civilian population and growing police contingents
are neccessary to protect the meetings of leading politicians in these days. The
always legitimate critic on their politics regains actuality again in connection with
the financial crisis.

Again(-st) the crisis

Global economy is in its worst crisis since the crash of 1929. This crash was only
the foreshock of the big crisis with pauperization on a huge scale and millions of
unemployed. Are the real troubles like at that time still waiting for us at the moment?

It is fatal to blame greedy managers, bankers and speculators for the crisis. Also
the workers in the USA, who bought their houses and cars on credits which they
couldn’t pay back, are not guilty. It is the capitalist world order, which again and
again causes an overproduction of goods for which there are no buyers. At the moment
there is not enough profit made out of the production of goods - meaning the
exploitation of our labour-power - because of this, investions are made within
speculations.

The comparison of a bad neoliberal capitalism and a good productive, maybe even
social capitalism only distracts from the fact that there is only one capitalism. And
this one produces its own crises automatically. They arise on a more or less regular
base even though not everywhere at the same time. Politics and economy now try to
reflate the system with rescue programmes and economic stimulus packages. But the
hundreds of billions wich are now spend for rescuing banks and corporations are by no
means play money. We and the following generations shall pay them by wage cuts,
lengthening of working hours, new dues, more taxes, economizings and cuttings of
social benefits.

The institutions of the leading industrial nations are forced to deal with the
consequences of the crisis. Topics on the agenda of this years summit of the
self-announced “World Governance” (Italys foreign minister about the G8) are climate,
raw materials, aliments and migration as risks for the security policy of the
industrial nations. The limited reserves of raw materials and aliments shall
therefore also be allocated by miltary means to the advantage of the leading
industrial nations. By this the less industrialized nations feel the full furce of
the crisis caused by the politics of the G8 nations at first.

…Repression as crisis management

Jaka je rekel/-la:

Začnimo razmišljati kako naprej!

Gogi je rekel/-la:

Nakladate

Elena Pečarič je rekel/-la:

pričakovala sem kaj več od vas

Elena Pečarič je rekel/-la:

»Velespoštovana gospoda v državnem zboru!

Neradi vas vznemirjamo ob taki uri, ko navadno se po dolgem dopoldnevu človek ozirati začne za južino, a druge ni, saj ravno v zvezi s hrano in osnovnim bivanjem se moramo pomeniti, oziroma razjasniti preneke točke, ki zdi se, so ušle iz misli vam začasno, a skrajšam naj uvod, preden razložim, kako zakaj, ker malo ni vseh točk, naj jih kar naštejem. Gre za petdeset škodljivih res posledic, povezanih močno z izpuščanjem umetno spremenjenih organizmov v naravo, oziroma v verigo ljudske hrane:

1- Smrt – že leta 1989 je zaradi Triptofana – GS nadomestka za hrano, umrlo v ZDA 37 ljudi
2- Rak – zaradi GH proteina za mlečnost krav je možnost raka na dojkah, in na prostati povečana za 4 x
3 - Pojav novih alergenov, prenos znanih alergenov na nealergenska živila
4 - pojav novih toksinov, pojav novih virusov in supervirusov
5 - prenasičenost z antibiotiki, odpornost na antibiotike
6 - nevarnost mutacij in okužb v človeških celicah
7 - manjši notranji organi, predvsem prizadetost reproduktivnih organov
8 - manjšanje biotske raznolikosti
9 - dolgoročno nepredvidljivi vplivi
10 – nepovratna kontaminacija ekosistema…

…naj dovolj zaenkrat bo, da ne bi dolgočasli vas po nepotrebnem. Zavedamo se namreč, da vladati Slovencem res ni lahka stvar, nobenega zavidanja ni vredna. Kako lahko politikom na Laškem je, saj več kot šestdeset milijonov davkoplačevalcev prebiva po vsem škornju, kako lahko Francoskim je poslancem, z desetkrat večjo površino zemlje, z vsaj tolko večjimi prihodki! Kako lahko angleškim članom parlamenta je, po celem svetu jih dovolj razumejo, da drugi jih jeziki ne zanimajo. Kako lahko politikom je tam čez lužo, v ZDA, cel svet se jih boji s tako veliko vojsko, kako lahko je drugim in kako težko je vam, gospodom in gospem, s takšno majhno krpo zemlje in s takšnimi podložniki, ki vse premalo vam prinašamo dobička in vse preveč težav vam delamo, če z drugim ne, pa s tem da brigamo se sami zase. Najhujši izmed vseh pa smo umetniki, za vas fosili živi, saj ceh izvira naš še iz kamene dobe, politika pa je novejša, države otroci so kovinske dobe.

Pa ni tako le, gospodje in gospe poslanci, bo nekaj dobrega se tudi našlo v naših genih, na primer dan današnji lep dokaz je ravno dejstva, da ljudstvo in umetniki smo tisti ki pravo pot vam kažemo, le slišati in videti je treba. Ko Cankar je omenjal hlapce, gotovo tega ni počel da bi jadikoval, obratno je želel, spregledanje ljudi, izhod v rešitev. Če danes bil bi Cankar tu, gotovo bi priporočil vam vsem gospodom in gospem poslankam in poslancem, da vse storite v smeri varovanja domovine in ne pustite, da iz tujine bi vas kdo hotel za svoje hlapce in z vami nas.

Ko Levstik je povest napisal o Krpanu, gotovo ni hotel povedati, kako neumen je slovenski kmet, nasprotno, pokazal moč je ljudstva in posameznikov, rešilno za državo.

Če Franc Prešeren danes bil bi tu, kaj bi porekel? Kaj Aškerc, Vodnik, Trubar, Dalmatin? Kaj Grohar, Jama, Jakopič, Sternen? Kaj rekla bi Kobilica Ivana? Usmerila bi vas na pravo pot, kot mi.

Po drugi strani, spoštovani, naj spomnim vas, da tudi vi ste le ljudje, kot mi. In roko na srce, čeprav težavni smo ljudje in sploh umetniki, pa vendar, ljudje kot Grohar, Trubar in Prešeren, ki delali tako rekoč so zgago, so danes vir ponosa vseh Slovencev, tudi vas, gospodov in gospa iz parlamenta.

In še, če vrnemo na gensko spremenjena bitja se, katerih soobstoj z naravo je potrjen z zakonom, ki ste ga vi, gospodje in gospe poslanci, sprejeli mimo naše volje, Slovencev in Slovenk.

Gospodje in gospe poslanke in poslanci, zavedamo se, da peza vseh pritiskov iz ozadja meddržavnih, medcelinskih, medglobalnih in tako naprej naporna je, da zdi se lažje ljudstvo naplahtati, kot pa reči bobu bob v mednarodni areni. Pa ni tako. Brez nas ni vas in mi smo vaša moč, in tu stojimo prav zato, da vi postanete močnejši, ko pogovarjate se z drugimi o nas in domovini. Lahko porečete, da res lahko ni biti oblastnik Slovencem, saj dobesedno jemljemo, da vi poslanci naši ste in ne obratno, da mi plačujemo vas in ne obratno. Porecite jim, da sitni smo Slovenci, ko gre za nas in domovino. Sitni, tečni, trmasti, kot alpinisti, smučarji plavalci, kolesarji in umetniki.

Povejte jim, lobistom vsem, ki bodo vas poskušali prepričati, da vi poskušate prepričati vse nas, da belo črno je in črno belo, povejte jim, da ljudstvo vam preprosto ne verjame in ne pusti izbire. Povejte jim, da smo odločeni in vztrajni.

Povejte jim, da hočemo konkretno:
1 – najmanj dvajsetletni varnostni pridržek - absolutni moratorij na gojenje genetsko modificiranih organizmov v Sloveniji – tudi za poskusne nasade.

2 – zakon o razglasitvi celotne Slovenije kot ekološke cone – biotski park EU, z absolutno prepovedjo gojenja GSO s toleranco 0.0 promila.

3 – Vsi uvoženi prehranski artikli z merljivo vsebnostjo GSO nad 0.0 promila morajo biti označeno s posebno nalepko ‘vsebuje GSO’

4 – posebej stroga pravila se naj sprejme glede uvoza živinske krme – dovoljena vsebnost GSO naj bo 0.0 promila. Obstoječi zakoni naj se čim prej ustrezno popravijo

5 – posebej stroga naj bodo pravila glede dodatkov hrani iz GSO soje in GSO koruze. Obstoječi zakoni naj se čim prej ustrezno popravijo.

6 - Slovenija je dovolj majhna in obenem dovolj rodovitna, da si, če ne drugače, lahko pridela večino hrane sama. Sprejmejo naj se ukrepi, ki bodo zagotovili razvoj v smeri, da se v Sloveniji pridela toliko hrane, kot je potrebujemo sami, pri čemer se uporabljajo izključno ekološke metode (posaditev javnih-neprofitnih sadnih dreves na javnih površinah, povečana stopnja samooskrbe, dostop do zemlje vsem, ki jo žele obdelovati).

7 – sedanji zakon o soobstoju GSO z naravnimi rastlinami dejansko ničesar ne regulira brez dodatnih podzakonskih aktov. Ti podzakonski akti, katerih sploh še ni, pa so hkrati potencialne šibke točke zakona in glede na okoliščine nam ne more nihče zagotoviti, da se ne bodo podzakonski akti izkoriščali ravno v nasprotne namene, namreč za luknjanje zakona in raztegovanje lukenj v zakonu. Te luknje pa lahko učinkovito preprečijo le: razpustitev vseh organov, v katerih sede le zagovorniki GSO, Absolutni moratorij iz točke 1, ter zakon o razglasitvi celotne Slovenije kot ekološke cone iz točke 2. Slednji omogoča tudi zahtevo Slovenije, da vsaj 50 kilometrov daleč od slovenske meje ni nobenega gojišča GSO.

Tako, spoštovane gospe poslanke in spoštovani gospodje poslanci. Tako povejte vsem lobistom, ki skušali za nos vas bodo potegniti in prepričati, da vi za nos potegnete še nas. Povejte jim, da se ne damo in da shode bomo shajali kar vsakih štirinajst dni. Tako je slišali ste prav! Čez tedna dva ponovno pridemo vas spomnit, kaj vaša je dolžnost.

Glas ljudstva vreden je posluha, saj rešil tudi vašim bo otrokom domovino. Le ena je, narava skupna naša. In kot so rekli naši stari: ‘če hočeš medu, ne mlati po panju!’«

9. 7. 2009

Združenje umetnikov Paviljon